Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fastR of puppets well with my current set up i should be getting 51-52 hp, and compared to my R which had plenty of work done to it, but still on a stocker cylinder, there not even close, and next year i will be sending my motor off to atp for lots of head work to be done, transmission coating(its a ltr thing) and a high comp piston to run sunoco 110, and i should be very close to 60hp and 32ish lbs of torque, the thing with LTRs is taht there not even meant to be fast, there the heaviest 450 aswell. There all about suspension and mx, there also geared very low so they wont do the greatest in drags, i think if the LTR has any motor work done, your gunna need bigger than a 310, correct me if im wrong, but most 310s put out what, 53 hp? thats pretty good, but they still lack torque, so thats where youll need the extra ccs, i know everyone will argue with my post as usual because im speaking against there beloved 2 strokes, but im being realistic here.
And catch me if you can, if the LTR has the sparky out and has a crbm, it should still beat a stocker raptor |
HES BACK!!! so if it was 48 hp bone stock, your intake and pipe only added 3 horse? that sucks... id ask for a refund on that hunk! haha
they arnt meant to be fast? so slower is better..? make up your mind, i think those guys at ltr450hq have you brainwashed already... yea they are the heaviest 450, by quite a bit, but whats that have to do with suspension and its purpose as an mx quad?? you arnt making much sense man..wouldnt lighter be better for mx...?
no one would argue your posts if you tried to at least make some sense for once...
and have you raced a stock raptor with your stock 450 to know this? or does it just beat a raptor cause you own it? same old shit.. i bet your stock 250 would have beat a stock raptor too, (6 months ago when your 250r was the best)