1982 atc 250r vs yamaha warrior 350

[DirtDemon]

Originally Posted by rm250dude

i love 2 stroke power

As do all of us.

[SHOWTIME]

250r would win...hehe ask him to race for money $.

[dustin420]

i hope the 250r wins, i raced my friends warrior with a completly stock blaster and it was dead even till top end then he pulled away, the blaster was all stock and the warrior had razr tires with a kn filter.

[Yamaboy1983]

i'd say the f350 would win

[rm250dude]

maybe ill race him for his ride then sell it on ebay when i win so i can rebuild my 1992 rm 250 motor

[fulltiltrider]

Originally Posted by Michael Jackson

warriors are absolute PIGS, yes their top speeds might be decent in the mid to high 60's or so, but it takes them 2 1/2 days to get there, i saw one riding yesterday, thing was struggling to make it up some hills that arnt even steep, he was boggin out barley making it up in 2nd gear WOT, where as everyone else goin up in 3rd

That is fuckin funny, 21/2 days, Reminds me of when we used to pick on one of my friends with a mustang. We used to tell him . Mustang, 0 to 60 in three trys. LOL

[DirtDemon]

Originally Posted by Yamaboy1983

i'd say the f350 would win

I'd say your crazy, I've ridden 250R's and I've ridden warriors, and the R's are way faster.

[Atc-Eric]

Originally Posted by DirtDemon

I'd say your crazy, I've ridden 250R's and I've ridden warriors, and the R's are way faster.

I agree with you, as I own both! The Warrior is a great trail machine, its not built for speed.

[kevin1x]

the 250r is going to kick ass, warriors a crap.

[Duneman101]

we are talking an air cooled 250r not one of the spiffy liquid cooled... there was a big difference in power, but i think it ought to take the warrior, probably not kill/spank it, but it should do the trick.... you just gotta launch it right.